Builders' Supply Depot v. O'Connor
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
Three mechanics’ lien cases were consolidated and tried together, and judgment was rendered against Dennis O’Connor and Mary O’Connor, the owners of the land involved, who appeal from the judgment.
The judgment must be reversed for the following reasons: 1. The actions were not brought by the original contractor; they were all brought for material and labor furnished by plaintiffs as sub-contractors. Nevertheless personal judgments were rendered against the appellants. This was error, as plaintiffs were entitled only to enforce their claims against the land.
2. There was a written contract…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Durkee v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
- Davidson v. JenningsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
- Wilder v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Atkinson v. WoodmanseeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Folsom v. Butte County Assn. of GovernmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Beyerbach v. Juno Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Roberts v. Security Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Guldberg v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.