Mayer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILSON, Justice.
Appellant, Wesley Mayer, appeals the entry of summary judgment. Appellant sought to recover from appellee, State Farm, under his uninsured motorist coverage for an accident caused by a hit and run auto that did not have direct physical contact with appellant’s motorcycle. Appellant argues in three points of error the court incorrectly granted summary judgment because: 1) it was not necessary for appellant to prove actual physical contact between himself and the unidentified vehicle; 2) the rule of indirect contact applies in this ease, satisfying the policy requirement…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- Goldberg v. United States Shoe Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. MatlockTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- Latham v. Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Collier v. Employers National Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Summers v. Fort Crockett Hotel, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
- Cigna Insurance Co. of Texas v. Rubalcada, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998
- Esco Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Sooner Pipe & Supply Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998
- Le v. Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
- Burton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.