Legal Opinion

Cigna Insurance Co. of Texas v. Rubalcada

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided January 15, 1998No. 01-96-01108-CVPublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’CONNOR, Justice.

We are asked to decide if a worker receiving compensation under a Compromise Settlement Agreement (CSA) may claim additional benefits under the Workers’ Compensation Act for new injuries sustained during treatment for the original injury. The answer is no. We reverse and render

judgment for the appellant, Cigna Insurance Company of Texas.

Summary of the Facts

Eliazar Rubalcada, the plaintiff, was injured on the job in 1989. In 1991, the plaintiff and Cigna signed a CSA providing for medical care until August 1994. Cigna paid the plaintiff $38,000 and provided three years…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Lear Siegler, Inc. v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Cincinnati Life Insurance Co. v. CatesTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Commissioners Court of Titus County v. AganTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Jones v. StraussTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Tobin v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1958

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Frost National Bank v. Burge, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  2. Wheeler v. Methodist Hospital, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
  3. Crain v. Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee of the Supreme Court of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. Weaver v. Highlands Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
  5. Ledig v. Duke Energy Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API