Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. United States Shoe Corp.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided July 20, 1989No. 01-88-00779-CVPublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment rendered in favor of United States Shoe Corporation (“U.S. Shoe”) and its operating division, Retail Development, Inc. (“RDI”).

The appellant, Billy B. Goldberg (“Goldberg”), sued Western Development Corp. (“WDC”), Herbert Miller, Richard Kramer, Gerald Dillon, U.S. Shoe, and U.S. Shoe’s operating division, RDI, alleging fraud and breach of fiduciary duty. After rendition of the summary judgment in favor of the appellees U.S. Shoe and RDI, the cause of action against the appellees was severed by the court.

In points of error one and two,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Stone v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Delgado v. BurnsTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Griffin v. RowdenTexas Supreme Court · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Barbouti v. Hearst Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996
  2. Marchal v. Webb, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  3. Dyson Descendant Corp. v. Sonat Exploration Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  4. Lawson v. B Four Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994
  5. Benavides v. Moore, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API