Legal Opinion

Latham v. Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 30, 1972No. 15892PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment granted in a suit for damages brought under the uninsured motorist provisions of an insurance policy. The decisive question on this appeal concerns the proper interpretation of the “hit-and-run automobile” coverage included in the uninsured motorist provisions of the policy.

The plaintiffs in the trial court, Sarah Latham and Nora Carter, alleged that while their car was stopped in a line of traffic in obedience to the command of a police officer, a car immediately behind them was struck from the rear by a pick-up truck and propelled…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Womack v. Allstate Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Bimco Iron & Metal Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Continental Casualty Co. v. WarrenTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  4. International Travelers' Ass'n v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 1930
  5. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. HamblenTexas Supreme Court · 1945

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Clark v. Regent Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. DeMello v. First Insurance Company of Hawaii, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1974
  3. ILLINOIS NAT'L INSURANCE CO. v. PalmerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. Ragsdale v. RagsdaleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Collier v. Employers National Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1993

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API