Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Matlock

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1970No. B-1809PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

We grant the motion for rehearing filed in this cause by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, set aside our former judgment which affirmed the judgments of the trial court and court of civil appeals, withdraw our former opinion, and render judgment that William A. Matlock and wife take nothing in their suit against State Farm.

The Matlocks suffered injuries in an accident with a car driven by a man identified in this record only as a man with one leg. They knew the name of this man, but did not testify about his name. Upon the theory that he was an uninsured motorist…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Levy v. American Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  2. Shaller v. Commercial Standard Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Jordan v. Pacific Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. In re the Arbitration between Merchants Mutual Insurance & SchmidNew York Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance v. GottsponerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Brainard v. Trinity Universal Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Royal Globe Insurance Co. v. Bar Consultants, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Laverie v. WetherbeTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Sikes v. ZuloagaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Ogle v. LongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API