State v. ZAPUTIL
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALL, Judge.
¶ 1 The State of Aizona appeals the trial court’s ruling denying the victim’s claim for restitution. The trial court denied the claim based on a finding that it lacked jurisdiction to order restitution because the judgment of guilt had been set aside under Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) section 13-907 (Supp. 2006). For reasons that follow, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 On September 27, 2004, Michael Zapu-til (Zaputil) pled guilty pursuant to a plea agreement to an amended charge of theft, a class 1 misdemeanor. The charge…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Roberts v. SprayArizona Supreme Court · 1950
- State v. IniguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- State v. PintoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- State v. MerrillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Parsons v. Arizona Department of Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- State of Arizona v. Reuben Renee CotaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- State v. NuckolsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- State v. UNKEFERCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- State v. GrijalvaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.