Legal Opinion

State v. ZAPUTIL

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 10, 2008No. 1 CA-CR 07-0644PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HALL, Judge.

¶ 1 The State of Aizona appeals the trial court’s ruling denying the victim’s claim for restitution. The trial court denied the claim based on a finding that it lacked jurisdiction to order restitution because the judgment of guilt had been set aside under Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) section 13-907 (Supp. 2006). For reasons that follow, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 On September 27, 2004, Michael Zapu-til (Zaputil) pled guilty pursuant to a plea agreement to an amended charge of theft, a class 1 misdemeanor. The charge…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Roberts v. SprayArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  2. State v. IniguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  3. State v. PintoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  4. State v. MerrillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  5. State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Arizona Department of Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  2. State of Arizona v. Reuben Renee CotaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. State v. NuckolsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  4. State v. UNKEFERCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  5. State v. GrijalvaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API