State v. Grijalva
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILLER, Judge:
¶ 1 Petitioner Juan Grijalva seeks review of the trial court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to Rule 32, Ariz. R. Crim. P. “We will not disturb a trial court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief absent a clear abuse of discretion.” State v. Swoopes, 216 Ariz. 390, ¶ 4, 166 P.3d 945, 948 (App. 2007). Grijalva has not sustained his burden of establishing such abuse here.
¶ 2 Pursuant to a plea agreement, Grijalva was convicted of theft of a means of trans*73portation. The trial court imposed a minimum, 2.5-year term of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. SwoopesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Town of South Tucson v. Board of SupervisorsArizona Supreme Court · 1938
- State v. FancherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- State v. HolguinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- State v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. CervantesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018