Legal Opinion

State v. Grijalva

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 7, 2017No. 2 CA-CR 2016-0176-PRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MILLER, Judge:

¶ 1 Petitioner Juan Grijalva seeks review of the trial court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to Rule 32, Ariz. R. Crim. P. “We will not disturb a trial court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief absent a clear abuse of discretion.” State v. Swoopes, 216 Ariz. 390, ¶ 4, 166 P.3d 945, 948 (App. 2007). Grijalva has not sustained his burden of establishing such abuse here.

¶ 2 Pursuant to a plea agreement, Grijalva was convicted of theft of a means of trans*73portation. The trial court imposed a minimum, 2.5-year term of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. SwoopesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Town of South Tucson v. Board of SupervisorsArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  3. State v. FancherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  4. State v. HolguinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  5. State v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. CervantesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  2. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API