Legal Opinion

State v. Iniguez

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 11, 1991No. 1 CA-CR 89-465PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANKFORD, Judge.

Edward Iniguez, Jr. timely appeals from a restitution order requiring him to pay $50,000.00 of restitution as a condition of probation. The restitution order followed a settlement of a civil action between defendant and his victims. The defendant’s insurer paid a substantial sum and in exchange the victims executed a release of all claims.

This appeal requires us to decide the effect of a settlement payment in a civil damages action upon restitution in a criminal case.

I

In July of 1987, Iniguez was driving his vehicle while intoxicated and collided with another vehicle,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. LemireCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  2. Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Kriz v. Buckeye Petroleum Co., Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. FaderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. United States v. Tom E. Tiler, Roy Y. Sakai and Ty-Sak Agencies, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. LaycockUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. HamiltonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. State v. HunzikerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  4. State v. ApplegateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  5. Kirby v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API