State v. UNKEFER
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORRIS, Judge.
¶ 1 Sherman E. Unkefer appeals the superior court’s denial of his motion to vacate a criminal restitution order (“CRO”) entered by the court 12 years after he had completed his prison sentence. On appeal, he argues the 12-year delay by itself violated Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 13-805 (2010). As relevant here, this statute states a CRO “shall” be entered “at the time” the defendant completes his or her period of probation or sentence (collectively, “criminal sentence”). In State v. Pinto, 179 Ariz. 593, 596, 880 P.2d 1139, 1142 (App.1994), we held this…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Dolan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Town of Chino Valley v. City of PrescottArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- United States v. Uri Sheinbaum, United States of America v. Marc A. BirnbaumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Mejak v. GranvilleArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. PintoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Frank Hoffman v. Hon. chandler/stateArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- State of Arizona v. Reuben Renee CotaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018