Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Spray

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1950No. 5325PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHELPS, Justice.

Plaintiffs-appellants herein, brought this action under the Declaratory Judgment Act; A.C.A.1939, § 27-701 et seq., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, against defendants-appellees, members of the board of supervisors of Pinal County, and Fred O. Wilson as Attorney General of the state, seeking to have declared unconstitutional House Bill No. 170 enacted as chapter 27 of the Session Laws of 1949 and known as the “Hospital District Act of 1949.”

Appellants allege in their complaint that the Act violates the 14th amendment to the Constitution of the United…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cooper Manufacturing Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. McCullough v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Green v. FrazierSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Kentucky Railroad Tax CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Hernandez v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1949

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Kilpatrick v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. City of Mesa v. KillingsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Hart v. Bayless Investment & Trading CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Ruth v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Mardian Construction Co. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1976

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API