Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Morrissey v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 24, 1985No. 84-601PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
By this original action in mandamus, relator maintains the commission abused its discretion by failing to find a violation of the following safety requirements contained in Ohio Adm. Code 4121:1-3-12:
“(E) Minimum instructions for qualifying operators.
“Instructions to operators in order to teach them the use of portable explosive-actuated fastening tools shall include, but shall not be limited to the following items:
“(1) Before using a tool, the operator shall inspect it to determine that it is clean, that all moving parts operate freely, and that the barrel is free from obstructions.
“(2) When…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State ex rel. Haines v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State ex rel. G F Business Equipment, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State ex rel. Humble v. Mark Concepts, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1979
- State ex rel. Roberts v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State ex rel. Cox v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State ex rel. Cotterman v. St. Marys FoundryOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Weich Roofing, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- State ex rel. G & S Metal Products, Inc. v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Cincinnati Drum Service, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.