Legal Opinion
State ex rel. G & S Metal Products, Inc. v. Moore
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided September 24, 1997No. 95-545PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
Moore argues that G & S committed a VSSR by failing to conduct weekly inspections, in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions, of press pull guards installed to comply with Ohio Adm.Code 4121:1 — 5—11 (E)(4). For the reasons that follow, we disagree and affirm the court of appeals’ judgment.
Ohio Adm.Code 4121:1 — 5—11(E) provides:
“Every hydraulic or pneumatic (air-powered) press shall be constructed, or shall be guarded, to prevent the hands or fingers of the operator from entering the danger zone during the operating cycle. Acceptable methods of guarding are: a * * *
“(4) Pull guard —…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State ex rel. Burton v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State ex rel. Trydle v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State ex rel. Reed v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- State ex rel. Newman v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State ex rel. Precision Steel Servs., Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
- State Ex Rel. Richmond v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2014
- State ex rel. Strawser v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
- State ex rel. Armstrong Steel Erectors, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State ex rel. G & S Metal Products, Inc. v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.