Legal Opinion

In Re Discipline of Lerner

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 2008No. 49331PublishedCited by 154 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Hardesty, J.:

In this case, we engage in an automatic de novo review of a Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board hearing panel’s recommendation that attorney Glen Lerner receive a public reprimand for violating Nevada Rule of Professional Conduct (RPC) 5.5, which prohibits a lawyer from assisting in the unauthorized practice of law. The violation was based on certain activities by Lerner’s employee, who was a licensed attorney in Arizona but not in Nevada. In deciding whether clear and convincing evidence supports this violation, we are primarily concerned with the issue of…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by154 opinions

  1. Jackson v. United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2011
  2. In re Virgin Islands Bar Ass'n CommitteeSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013
  3. Lola v. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  4. IN RE: DISCIPLINE OF CHRISTOPHER R. ARABIANevada Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Eby v. Johnston Law Office, P.C.Court of Appeals of Nevada · 2022

149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API