Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Monfried

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 22, 2002No. Misc. Docket AG No. 53, Sept. Term, 2000PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAKER, Judge.

The Attorney Grievance Commission, acting through Bar Counsel, filed a petition with this Court for disciplinary action against William Michael Monfried, respondent, alleging viola tions of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct (hereinafter “MRPC”). The Commission charged respondent with violating MRPC 1.1 (Competence), 1 1.3 (Diligence), 2 1.4 (Communication), 3 1.5 (Fees), 4 8.1 (Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters), 5 and 8.4 (Misconduct). 6 We referred the matter to Judge Kaye Allison of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City to make findings of fact and proposed…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AwuahCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GuidaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. UgwuonyeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API