Legal Opinion

In Re Discipio

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1994No. 76460PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McMORROW

In this attorney discipline case, respondent, Francis M. Discipio, concedes that he violated the Code of Professional Responsibility (the Code) when he improperly divided his legal fees with Jerome Ruther, a disbarred attorney. However, respondent disputes whether he aided Ruther in the unauthorized practice of law when he permitted Ruther to gather preliminary factual information from workers’ compensation clients and obtain the clients’ signatures to pertinent documents. We conclude that respondent’s actions aided Ruther in the unauthorized practice of law. For respondent’s violations of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. O'HARA v. AhlgrenIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. People Ex Rel. Chicago Bar Ass'n v. GoodmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  3. People Ex Rel. Illinois State Bar Ass'n v. SchaferIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  4. In Re KrasnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  5. In Re ImmingIllinois Supreme Court · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. King v. First Capital Financial Services Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HallmonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. SperlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Downtown Disposal Services, Inc. v. The City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 2012

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API