Legal Opinion

Berntsen v. Coopers & Lybrand

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1996No. S-94-226, S-94-280 and S-94-283PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

Bernard Berntsen, Rheem Manufacturing Company, and Richard Berntsen (collectively referred to as “the appellants”) appeal from the granting of demurrers filed by Coopers & Lybrand. In each case, the district court ruled that the cause of action was barred by the applicable statute of limitations. The appeals have been consolidated for purposes of this opinion.

SCOPE OF REVIEW

In considering a demurrer, a court must assume that the pleaded facts, as distinguished from legal conclusions, are true as alleged and must give the pleading the benefit of any reasonable inference from the facts alleged,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Spath v. MorrowNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Rosnick v. MarksNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Sanitary & Improvement District 57 v. City of ElkhornNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Calabro v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Touche Ross & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Auto Services Co., Inc. v. KPMG, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. Alston v. Hormel Foods Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Baltensperger v. WellensiekNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Egan v. StolerNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Shlien v. Board of Regents of the University of NebraskaNebraska Supreme Court · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API