Legal Opinion

Egan v. Stoler

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 2002No. S-01-461PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCormack, J.

NATURE OF CASE

Timothy S. Egan appeals from an order sustaining a motion for summary judgment in favor of appellee, Alan G. Stoler. The district court found Egan’s claims barred by the statute of limitations for professional negligence. We conclude that Egan has abandoned all of his claims except whether a statute of limitations for professional negligence applies to the claim of a conflict of interest and, if so, whether the statute of limitations ran barring Egan from bringing a professional negligence cause of action against Stoler. We conclude that Egan’s claim is time barred by the 2-year…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Witherspoon v. Sides Const. Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Reinke Manufacturing Co. v. HayesNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Lindsay Manufacturing Co. v. Universal Surety Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Zion Wheel Baptist Church v. HerzogNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Sack Bros. v. Tri-Valley Cooperative, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Auto Services Co., Inc. v. KPMG, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. Hass v. NethNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Kellogg v. Nebraska Department of Correctional ServicesNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Whipps Land & Cattle Co. v. Level 3 Communications, LLCNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Carruth v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API