St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Touche Ross & Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.
I. STATEMENT OF CASE
The defendants-appellees, Touche Ross & Company, now known as Deloitte & Touche, and Deloitte & Touche, hereinafter collectively referred to as Touche, successfully demurred to the operative petition filed against it by the plaintiff-appellant, St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, on the grounds that no cause of action had been stated and, further, that any cause of action which might have existed is time-barred. Following St. Paul’s refusal to amend, the district court dismissed the lawsuit. St. Paul asserts, in summary, that in so ruling, the district court…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- H. Rosenblum, Inc. v. AdlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Haddon View Investment Co. v. CoopersOhio Supreme Court · 1982
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Hoiengs v. County of AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Walpert, Smullian & Blumenthal, P.A. v. KatzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Lindsay Manufacturing Co. v. Universal Surety Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Healy v. LangdonNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- DeVaux v. DeVauxNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.