Legal Opinion

Sanitary & Improvement District 57 v. City of Elkhorn

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1995No. Nos. S-94-869, S-94-983, S-94-995PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, C.J.

Sanitary and Improvement District No. 57 (Chapel Hill) et al. and various others filed three separate actions, which are consolidated herein, to enjoin the total annexation of the Chapel Hill community and the partial annexation of Sanitary and Improvement District No. 157 (Skyline Ranches) by the City of Elkhorn (City). The cases — SID No. 57 v. City of Elkhom (S-94-995 (SID 1)), SID No. 57 v. City of Elkhom (S-94-869 (SID 2)), and In re SID No. 157 (S-94-983 (SID 3))-challenge the validity of the City’s annexation by arguing generally (1) that any attempted annexation was invalid because…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Hoiengs v. County of AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Wilson v. MiskoNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Healy v. LangdonNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Merrick v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. New Light Co. v. Wells Fargo Alarm ServicesNebraska Supreme Court · 1994

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. PONDEROSA RIDGE LLV v. Banner CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Baker's Supermarkets, Inc. v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Marten v. StaabNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Metropolitan Utilities District v. Twin Platte Natural Resources DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Robertson v. SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 17Nebraska Supreme Court · 1997

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API