Legal Opinion
Ryan v. J. Walter Thompson Company
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 29, 1971No. 69 Civ. 2249PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WYATT, District Judge.
These are motions for summary judgment, the first in time by defendant and the other by plaintiffs. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. All parties agree that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that summary judgment is appropriate. Each side insists that summary judgment must be for it. The conclusion reached is that defendant is entitled to summary judgment.
The action is brought under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“the Act”; 15 U.S.C. § 78j) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. Jurisdiction is claimed under Section 27 of the Act (15 U.S.C. § 78aa) and “the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Allen v. Biltmore Tissue Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Penthouse Properties, Inc. v. 1158 Fifth Avenue, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Doss v. YinglingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930
- Hassel v. PohleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Cowles v. Cowles Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Foltz v. U.S. News & World Report, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1986
- Ryan v. J. Walter Thompson Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Yeng Sue Chow v. Levi Strauss & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- Tully v. Mott Supermarkets, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1972
- Stockton v. LucasTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.