Legal Opinion

Tully v. Mott Supermarkets, Inc.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided February 2, 1972No. Civ. A. 835-71PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WHIPPLE, District Judge:

This matter is before the Court pursuant to what I have styled to be plaintiffs’ application for a preliminary injunction. The complaint alleges an illegal and secret conspiracy to usurp voting control of Wakefem Corporation. Plaintiffs predicate their right to relief upon the Federal Securities laws, 1 par ticularly Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. 240.lob-5, the New Jersey Securities Act, N.J. S.A. 49:3-47 et seq., wrongful interference with existing contractual relations, and breach of fiduciary duties.

This motion seeks an order, pending final determination on the…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Superintendent of Insurance of New York v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Tcherepnin v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Birnbaum v. Newport Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Landry v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  2. Tully v. Mott Supermarkets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  3. Ingenito v. Bermec CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  4. In Re Penn Central Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Hirsch v. DuPontDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API