Hassel v. Pohle
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Kelly, P. J.:
The defendant corporation made no answer to the complaint of the plaintiff incorporator and stockholder and consented to the entry of the judgment. It appears from the record that the board of directors disapproved of the transactions of the defendants Pohle and Nyselius, the president and secretary of the company, in attempting surreptitiously to obtain control of the company, and that they were removed from office by their fellow-directors. *655The persons from whom Pohle andNyselius obtained the ninety-five shares of stock involved in the action were originally made parties…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kent v. . Quicksilver Mining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Corporation of Brick Presbyterian Church v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1826
- Barrett v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- Longyear v. HardmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Matter of Petition of Argus Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Allen v. Biltmore Tissue Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Mather EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Yeng Sue Chow v. Levi Strauss & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- Barbour v. ThomasDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1933
- Edward A. Martin v. Graybar Electric Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.