Legal Opinion
Stockton v. Lucas
Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals
Decided August 15, 1973No. 2-8PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN OOSTERHOUT, Judge.
Plaintiffs Milton I. Stockton and Rose R. Stockton have taken this timely appeal from order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, entered March 14, 1973, dismissing their amended complaint upon defendants’ motion for summary judgment and from order entered March 29, 1973, denying plaintiffs’ motion for reargument and reaffirming the dismissal order. Plaintiffs in their complaint sought damages of $9,000.00 for defendants’ alleged violation of Phase I price regulations.
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment asserts many grounds for…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Helvering v. GowranSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- J. E. Riley Investment Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Thomas S. Barrett, Sr. v. James A. BaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- Penthouse Properties, Inc. v. 1158 Fifth Avenue, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Silverman v. Alcoa Plaza AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bath Iron Works Corp. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Anderson County, TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Estate of Posen v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
- Greenwood Utilities Commission v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Cruising World, Inc. v. WestermeyerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.