Legal Opinion
Yeng Sue Chow v. Levi Strauss & Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 24, 1975No. Civ. 34820PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KANE, J.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment granted in favor of respondent in an action brought for rescission of a stock repurchase option and for restitution. The relevant facts of the case are not in dispute and may be summarized as follows:
Appellant is the widow and executrix of the estate of Arthur Chow, deceased (“Arthur”). Arthur was employed by Levi Strauss & Co. (“the Company”) from 1959 until his death on May 27, 1970. During the period of his employment Arthur acquired 11,295 shares of the Company’s common capital stock under employee stock purchase plans. Under these…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Neal v. State Farm Insurance CompaniesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Simmons v. California Institute of TechnologyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Pauline v. FitzpatrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Allen v. Biltmore Tissue Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Graham v. Scissor-Tail, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
- Prudential Real Estate Affiliates, Inc. v. PPR Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- William Waggoner v. Robert Lee DallaireCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, a Partnership v. The Telex Corporation, a Corporation, and Telex Computer Products, Inc., AcorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- McLaughlin v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1983
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.