Emert v. Larami Corp.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Jones,
This appeal attacks an order of the Court of Common Pleas No. 2 of Philadelphia County which upheld the validity of a deputized service of a writ of summons in a trespass action under Rule 1043, Pa. R. C. P.
Roger L. Emert, a minor, and Richard L. Emert and Alice L. Emert (Emerts), instituted a trespass action in Court of Common Pleas No. 2 of Philadelphia County against Larami Corporation (Larami). In their complaint, the Emerts alleged: that they reside in Perkasie, Bucks County;1 that Larami is engaged, as manufacturer, employer, supplier, wholesaler and/or…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Fisher v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Shenandoah Borough v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Commonwealth v. BallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Cox v. Wilkes-Barre Railway Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Kuisis v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. CasperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Action Industries, Inc. v. WiedemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Goff v. Armbrecht Motor Truck Sales, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Kring v. University of PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.