Legal Opinion

Kuisis v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 22, 1974No. Appeal, No. 166PublishedCited by 236 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Pomeroy,

On January 17,1967, appellant, Andrew Kuisis, was injured by a load of steel pipe which fell on him when a brake locking mechanism on the crane from which the pipe was suspended became disengaged. Kuisis brought suit against appellee Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corporation (Baldwin), the manufacturer and seller of the crane.1 At the conclusion of the evidence, Baldwin’s motion for a directed verdict was denied and the case went to the jury, which was dismissed when it could not agree on a verdict. The court en banc thereafter denied Kuisis’ motion for a new trial and…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Williams v. Brown Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by236 opinions

  1. Tincher, T. v. Omega Flex, Inc., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Sterilite Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  3. Dambacher by Dambacher v. MallisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. General Motors Corp. v. HopkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Miller v. Brass Rail Tavern, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

231 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API