Cox v. Wilkes-Barre Railway Corp.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Maxey,
This is an appeal from the refusal of the court below to permit plaintiff to amend her statement of claim in an action of tort by adding thereto, more than four years after the accident in question, the following: “In then and there failing and neglecting to maintain, in reasonably safe condition, its right-of-way on said highway, by permitting deep and dangerous ruts to accumulate and remain thereon, making it unsafe for other vehicles to travel said highway.”
The statement sought to be amended charged the defendant company with a violation of duty on the part of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Martin v. Pittsburg Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Mays v. United Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Raskus v. Allegheny Valley Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
3Cited by35 opinions
- Kuisis v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Saracina v. CotoiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Junk v. East End Fire DepartmentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Smith v. FennerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Stadler v. Mt. Oliver BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.