Action Industries, Inc. v. Wiedeman
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Spaeth, J.,
This is an appeal from an order dismissing preliminary objections to jurisdiction and venue. 1 Appellant contends that the court did not have in personam jurisdiction over him because he is a nonresident not within the reach of Pennsylvania’s “long-arm” statute, Act of Nov. 15, 1972, P.L. 271, §8301 et seq., eff. Feb. 13, 1973, 42 Pa. S. §8301 et seq. (Supp. 1973-74), and that the substituted service used to obtain jurisdiction over him was invalid because the suit was not filed in the county where the action arose as required by Pa. R. C. P. 2077-2079.
On November 9,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Proctor & Schwartz, Inc. v. Cleveland Lumber Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Rufo v. the Bastian-Blessing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Koenig v. International Brotherhood of BoilermakersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- B. J. McAdams, Inc. v. BoggsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Stateside MacHinery Company, Ltd., a Corporation Organized Under the Laws of Great Britain and Armin Speigel v. Joel M. AlperinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Hart v. McCollumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Romeo v. LooksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.