Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Hill

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 27, 1951No. Appeals, 9 and 11PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Chidsey,

This is an action by George E. Fisher, Jr., individually and in his own right, and as administrator of the estate of George E. Fisher, 3rd, deceased, against William H. Hill, under the Wrongful Death and Survival Statutes, to recover damages occasioned by the death of his son, George E. Fisher, 3rd. These appeals are from the decree of the court below holding that by reason of a prior suit (Fisher v. Hill, 362 Pa. 286, 66 A. 2d 275) wherein Fisher sued as administrator of his wife’s estate and individually and in his own right under the Survival and Wrongful…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Noonan v. PardeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  3. Fields v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. McKay v. BeattySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Simodejka v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Ieropoli v. AC&S CORP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Yania v. BiganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Paulish v. BakaitisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Marinari v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Spinelli v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API