Legal Opinion

Kring v. University of Pittsburgh

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 3, 2003PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENDER, J.:

¶ 1 William T. Kring (Appellant) appeals ;pro se from the trial court order that transferred the underlying suit for wrongful use of civil proceedings, which Appellant brought against the University of Pittsburgh, the University of Pittsburgh School of Law, and the above-captioned individuals (collectively referred to as Ap-pellees), from the Washington County Court of Common Pleas to the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas pursuant to the trial court’s ruling on Appellees’ preliminary objections. 1 Appellant claims that the trial court erred in determining, pursuant to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Purcell v. Bryn Mawr HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Caplan v. Keystone Weaving Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Craig v. W. J. Thiele & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Shears v. RigleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Emert v. Larami Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Deyarmin v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Grose v. Procter & Gamble Paper ProductsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Harris v. BrillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Silver v. ThompsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Peters v. SidorovSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API