Legal Opinion

Fleming v. Bernardi

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided February 21, 1941No. Civil Action No. 20362PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKIN, District Judge.

This action seeks an order enjoining defendant from violating the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, Title 29, § 201 et seq., U.S.C.A. The answer admits the identity of the defendant and that the product which he manufactures, as well as the raw materials from which it is manufactured, are sold, transported, and delivered in interstate commerce. The answer specifically denies that the defendant ■ has violated or is now violating the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act. *271The defendant attached to the answer the following interrogatory:

“State the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boske v. ComingoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Ex Parte SackettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  3. Nichols v. Sanborn Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1938
  4. Schwartz v. Howard Hosiery Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Boysell Co. v. Colonial Coverlet Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1939

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. RomaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  2. Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964
  3. Bank Line v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  4. Durkin v. Pet Milk Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1953
  5. United States v. San Antonio Portland Cement Co.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API