Legal Opinion
Bank Line v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 1, 1948PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIFKIND, District Judge.
This is an application by the Bank Line, Ltd., for the relief authorized by Supreme Court Admiralty Rule 32C, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723, because of the failure of the United States to comply with the order of the District Court “to submit to libelants’ proctors for inspection and copying the record of said Naval Inquiry at Casablanca, except any portion of said record which deals solely with disciplinary action or proceedings, if any, directed, recommended or taken against naval personnel.”
The nature of the litigation, the circumstances under which the order…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Boske v. ComingoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- United States v. AndolschekCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- United States v. GraysonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- United States v. BeekmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Bank Line, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Compagnie Francaise d'Assurance Pour le Commerce Exterieur v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Boeing Airplane Company v. Thomas Coggeshall, Chairman, the Renegotiation Board, Thomas Coggeshall, Chairman, the Renegotiation Board v. Boeing Airplane Company, Boeing Airplane Company, Cross-Appellant v. Thomas Coggeshall, Chairman, the Renegotiation Board, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Boeing Airplane Co. v. CoggeshallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Pacific-Atlantic S. S. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.