Legal Opinion
United States v. San Antonio Portland Cement Co.
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided September 19, 1963No. Civ. A. No. 3080PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPEARS, Chief Judge.
This suit was brought by the Government against the defendant taxpayer to recover an allegedly erroneous refund of more than one million dollars of Federal income tax covering the taxable years 1953 through 1956.
The motion presently before the Court was filed by the defendant under Rule 34, F.R.Civ.P., to require the Government to produce certain intra-office reports, memoranda, or other documents of the Internal Revenue Service, for inspection and copying.
During the four years involved, the defendant was engaged in the business of mining limestone cement rock from a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Ellis Campbell, Jr., District Director of Internal Revenue v. J. M. Eastland and Montez EastlandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
- United States v. Cannelton Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Jack S. MacHin v. Eugene M. Zuckert, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States of America and Revenue Agents Clarence H. Isabel and John S. Reid of the Internal Revenue Service v. The El Paso CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. V. E. B. Carl Zeiss, JenaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1966
- Goodman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964
- Abel Investment Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1971
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.