Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Sackett

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 21, 1935No. 7704PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

The petitioner was an authorized and acting special agent in charge of the Division of Investigation in the United States Department of Justice. By a subpoena duces tecum issued out of the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California, Central" Division, in Special Site Sign Company, a Corporation, v. Foster & Kleiser Company, a Corporation, et al., petitioner was required to produce certain records and documents in his possession as such agent of the Department of Justice. He appeared in response to the subpoena and declined to produce the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boske v. ComingoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Caha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Footville Condensed Milk Co. v. WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1917

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Touhy v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. United States v. CoplonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  3. G. L. Christian and Associates v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  4. United States v. AndolschekCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  5. People v. ParhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API