Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Roma

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 14, 1959No. 12780PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRILL, District Judge.

Involved here is the question of the extent of what has been called the informer’s privilege (in reality the government’s privilege). Charging the defendants with violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act1, the plaintiff seeks in-junctive relief.

The business of the defendants is operating and keeping clean lavatories, wash*635rooms and barber shops in some stations of certain railroads. Interstate commerce engagement is conceded. The violations concern an alleged failure to pay wages in accordance with the statutory minimum and overtime requirements.2

In answering…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Scher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Bowman Dairy Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Weimerskirch v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977
  2. John T. Dunlop, Secretary of Labor v. Carriage Carpet CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
  3. In Re United States of America, Socialist Workers Party v. The Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. Jiles, Anthony, EliecerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  5. Elizabeth Dole, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Local 1942, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API