Legal Opinion
Cubic Applications, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 29, 1997No. 97-29CPublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is a bid protest action. It is the first such proceeding brought under the court’s recently expanded jurisdiction over post-award bid protests. The matter is presently before the court on the plaintiffs motion for expedited discovery and for limitation of the administrative record, and on the government’s motion to designate the entire administrative record existing at the General Accounting Office as the administrative record to be reviewed by this court. Oral argument was held on January 24, 1997. For the following reasons the government’s motion is granted,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Honeywell, Inc. v. The United States v. Haz-Tad, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Patrick Esch v. Clayton K. Yeutter, Secretary, U.S. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Murakami v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Cincom Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Gentex Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Analytical & Research Technology, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Amfac Resorts, L.L.C. v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.