Legal Opinion
Murakami v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 31, 2000No. 99-55CPublishedCited by 173 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALLEGRA, Judge.
This case is before the court on plaintiffs motion to supplement the administrative record created in agency proceedings before the Office of Redress Administration (ORA) and the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice. Plaintiff alternatively requests that this court take judicial notice of various aspects of the documents he seeks to add to the administrative record. Following oral argument and careful consideration of the parties’ filings regarding this matter, and for the reasons described below, the court DENIES plaintiff’s Request to Supplement the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by173 opinions
- Axiom Resource Management, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Murakami v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Serco Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Ashbritt, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Per Aarsleff A/S v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
168 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.