Legal Opinion

Wilhelm v. Frampton

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 2007No. 32922PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Justice.

This is a permissive appeal from a decision holding that the statute of limitations on an action to recover an allegedly excessive fee charged by an attorney was tolled while nonbinding fee arbitration proceedings were pending before the Idaho State Bar. We hold that the statute of limitations was not tolled and reverse.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In May and June 1997, Robert Wilhelm (Wilhelm) was arrested on two drug-related felony charges. He retained attorney Steven Frampton to represent him on both eases. On June 15, 1998, Wilhelm was sentenced to an indeterminate term…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Independent School Dist. of Boise City v. CallisterIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Antinoro v. BrownerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Stoltz v. Fry Foods, Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 2014
  2. Mark MacY v. Dan HowardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Alvarado v. BlackhawkDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2022
  4. Anthony Conner v. Dr. Kate Wilks; Centurion of Idaho, LLC; Dr. Haggard; TomiDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2026
  5. Ballard v. IDOCDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2025

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API