Legal Opinion

Antinoro v. Browner

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 4, 1996No. A96A1305PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Judge.

Pursuant to the Arbitration of Fee Disputes (AFD) program of the State Bar of Georgia, Ronald Browner filed a petition for arbitration with the State Bar Committee on the Arbitration of Attorney Fee Disputes (the Committee) complaining that his former lawyer, Len Antinoro, contracted with him to perform certain legal services, accepted a $19,000 fee, but failed to fully perform the services. Browner sought a partial refund of the fee and agreed to be bound by the arbitration. Antinoro filed a response to the petition denying that any refund was due and refusing to be bound by…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wallace v. WallaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  2. Vlass v. Security Pacific National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  3. Mitcham v. BlalockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. Hardin Construction Group, Inc. v. Fuller Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  5. Bennett v. Matt Gay Chevrolet Oldsmobile, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wilhelm v. FramptonIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Nodvin v. State Bar of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  3. Prince v. Bailey Davis, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  4. Farley v. BothwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  5. Deer Creek, Inc. v. Section 1031 Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API