Mark MacY v. Dan Howard
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ***
Mark Marion Macy appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations resulting from a police car chase that culminated in the death of Macy’s wife. .We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Hamilton v. Brown, 630 F.3d 889, 892 (9th Cir.2011) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A); Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir.1998) (order) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Macy’s § 1983 claims against defendants Howard and Lind…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Palmer v. ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Donald Robin BARREN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tom HARRINGTON, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Padgett v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Knox v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Probst v. Adams County Sheriff DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2020