Legal Opinion

Mark MacY v. Dan Howard

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 1, 2014No. 13-35992UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ***

Mark Marion Macy appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations resulting from a police car chase that culminated in the death of Macy’s wife. .We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Hamilton v. Brown, 630 F.3d 889, 892 (9th Cir.2011) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A); Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir.1998) (order) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Macy’s § 1983 claims against defendants Howard and Lind…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Palmer v. ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Donald Robin BARREN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tom HARRINGTON, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. Padgett v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Knox v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Probst v. Adams County Sheriff DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API