Independent School Dist. of Boise City v. Callister
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPARD, Justice.
This is an original proceeding seeking a writ of mandate against a district judge. Parties to special proceedings are properly referred to as “plaintiff” and “defendant,” I.C. § 7-101, however, herein, to avoid confusing the parties here with those in the case below the litigants here are called “petitioners” and “respondent.” Petitioners here are defendants in a personal injury case in the district court. Plaintiff be- ' low, R. Scott Patterson, brought suit for damages resulting from personal injuries suffered during school hours. In the court below, petitioners moved for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Thompson v. HaganIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
- Newlan v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
- Rich v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
- Jorstad v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Doe v. DurtschiIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Viehweg v. ThompsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
- Faucher v. City of AuburnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- Wilhelm v. FramptonIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- Farber v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.