Legal Opinion
Stoltz v. Fry Foods, Inc.
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided October 13, 2014No. Case No. 1:14-cv-00186-BLWPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
B. LYNN WINMILL, Chief Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Before the Court are two motions filed by the parties. In a somewhat unusual motion, Plaintiff Tobby Stoltz asks this Court to stay this case so that he may finish litigating a substantively identical suit he brought against Defendant Fry Foods, Inc. in Oregon state court. Pl.’s Motion to Stay, dkt. 12. Fry Foods opposes this motion, in part because Fry Foods moved to dismiss Stoltz’s complaint in this suit as time barred before Stoltz asked for a stay. Def.’s Motion to Dismiss, dkt. 6. For the following reasons, the Court…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fishman Jackson PLLC v. IsraelyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2016
- Barden v. GoodsellDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2021
- Cellucci v. Foster GarveyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023
- Evertson v. SibleyDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2022
- IQVIA Inc. v. Medimpact Healthcare Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.