Legal Opinion
Anthony Conner v. Dr. Kate Wilks; Centurion of Idaho, LLC; Dr. Haggard; Tomi
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided January 2, 2026No. 1:25-cv-00641Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ANTHONY CONNER, Case No. 1:25-cv-00641-BLW Plaintiff, INITIAL REVIEW ORDER BY v. SCREENING JUDGE DR. KATE WILKS; CENTURION OF IDAHO, LLC; DR. HAGGARD; TOMI; Defendants. The Clerk of Court conditionally filed Plaintiff Anthony Conner’s Complaint because of his status as a prisoner and request to proceed in forma pauperis. Dkts. 3, 1. A “conditional filing” means that Plaintiff must obtain authorization from the Court to proceed. Upon screening, the Court must dismiss claims that state a frivolous or malicious claim, fail to state a claim…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.