Legal Opinion
Krenwinkle v. City of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
Decided November 20, 1935No. L. A. 15177PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.
Plaintiff, a taxpayer, brings this action to compel cancellation of two lease agreements pertaining to land used as a municipal airport, and to compel the City of Los Angeles to discontinue and abandon the operation of the airport established and being maintained on the demised premises. Four demurrers to the amended complaint were sustained without leave to amend. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment of dismissal entered on the motion of defendants, following the order sustaining the demurrers.
The cause of action is based upon the contentions, as alleged in the amended complaint, that the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Walla Walla City v. Walla Walla Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- McBean v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- In Re City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Doland v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- City of Whittier v. DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Aviation Services, Inc. v. Bd. of Adjustment of Hanover Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- City of Los Angeles v. OffnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- City & County of San Francisco v. Western Air Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Dean v. KuchelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.