Legal Opinion
Babcock v. Community Redevelopment Agency
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 28, 1957No. Civ. 21586PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*39WOOD (Parker), J.
Action for injunction and declaratory relief. Plaintiff sought an injunction restraining defendants from entering into any contract with the United States government or any agency thereof, or from otherwise expending public funds, for the redevelopment of the Bunker Hill area of the city of Los Angeles. In another cause of action, plaintiff sought a declaration that the jurisdictional prerequisites for the redevelopment of said area do not exist.
Defendants are Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles (referred to as the agency), the city of Los Angeles…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Kaskel v. ImpellitteriNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Redevelopment Agency v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Stockus v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Moss v. MossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Miller v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Boone v. Redevelopment Agency of City of San JoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Graham v. HoulihanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Old Town Dev. Corp. v. Urban Renewal Agency of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.