Legal Opinion

Graham v. Houlihan

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 10, 1960PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, C. J.

This is an action for a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief brought in February, 1958, by the named plaintiff against the city of Torrington, the redevelopment agency of that city, and the individual members of the agency. The named plaintiff is the owner of real estate located within an area designated for redevelopment. Other property owners intervened as coplaintiffs. The named plaintiff, hereinafter called the plaintiff,, claims that the action of the redevelopment agency in establishing the redevelopment area is invalid and unconstitutional so far as it concerns his property,,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Wilson v. City of Long BranchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  3. Conley v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  4. Couch v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  5. Gohld Realty Co. v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  2. Katz v. BrandonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  3. Welch v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  4. Pet Car Products, Inc. v. BarnettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
  5. Broadriver, Inc. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API