Legal Opinion

San Francisco Sulphur Co. v. County of Contra Costa

California Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1929No. Docket No. S.F. 12806PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

The second amended complaint filed February 20, 1926, shows this action to he one by plaintiff as a property owner against the County of Contra Costa to enjoin the levy and collection of a special tax' designed to supply a bond fund to retire a quota of the bonds maturing under a street improvement proceeding begun by' the said county under the Street Improvement Law of 1907, as amended by the Statutes of 1921, page 312, chapter 232. To said complaint, which was supplemented by additional allegations, a demurrer was interposed by said county. Thereafter a hearing upon the said demurrer was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Quill v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. People ex rel. McCullough v. PachecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  4. People v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Davidow v. GriswoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Rider v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Woodill v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. McKinney v. RudermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. City of Santa Clara v. IvancovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. City of Yuba City v. Consolidated Mausoleum SyndicateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API