Legal Opinion

Quill v. City of Indianapolis

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1890No. 15,360PublishedCited by 90 opinions

From the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, C. J.

It is shown by the complaint, upon which all the questions in the present case arise, that the plaintiff, Thomas F. Quill, is a resident taxpayer of the city of Indianapolis, and the owner of a certain described lot in one of the additions to the city. It appears that the common council and board of aldermen, in August, 1889, assuming to proceed under the authority of the act of March 8th, 1889, entitled “An act concerning powers and duties of cities and incorporated towns, * * * providing the mode and manner of making street and alley improvements, and building sewers, * * and permitting…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mayor of Baltimore v. GillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  2. City of Valparaiso v. GardnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Ross v. StackhouseIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Board of Commissioners v. FullenIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Prezinger v. HarnessIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. City of Joliet v. AlexanderIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. EdgertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. City of Bowling Green v. KirbyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  4. Adams v. City of ShelbyvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. City of Laporte v. Gamewell Fire Alarm Telegraph Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1896

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API