Legal Opinion
McKinney v. Ruderman
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 30, 1962No. Civ. 6653PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment determining the existence of a street by dedication.
The street in question runs east and west; appears upon a map hereinafter designated; separates Lots 12 and 13 of Section 23 as shown on that map; and for many years has been known as West Sunny Dunes Road.
The plaintiffs are the owners of a portion of the westerly 139 feet of Lot 12, which is north of and abuts West Sunny Dunes Road. Adjoining them to the east, the remainder of Lot 12 fronting upon this road is owned by people named Hawthorne. The defendants are the owners of Lot 13, which is across the…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Bank of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- DiMartino v. CITY OF ORINDACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Marin v. City of San RafaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Polk v. PolkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Ullery v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Hanshaw v. Long Valley Road Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.